SITE LINK

상부 보철물에 따른 타진식 임플란트 안정성 측정기기의 수치 변화
Study of the Differences in a Percussion-type Implant Stability Measuring Instrument according to Type of Prosthesis

대한통합치과학회지 2021년 10권 1호 p.1 ~ 7

옥성미, 황희성, 김철훈, 김복주, 김정한, 권연우, 성현미, 강선우,

소속 상세정보

옥성미 ( Ok Sung-Mi ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Prosthodontics
황희성 ( Hwang Hee-Seong ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Prosthodontics
김철훈 ( Kim Chul-Hun ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
김복주 ( Kim Bok-Joo ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
김정한 ( Kim Jung-Han ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
권연우 ( Kwon Yeon-Woo ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Prosthodontics
성현미 ( Sung Hyun-Me ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Prosthodontics
강선우 ( Kang Sun-Woo ) - Dong-A University College of Medicine Department of Prosthodontics

KMID : 1146620210100010001

Abstract

In this study, we used the AnyCheck device to determine the effect on the implant stability test (IST) of different prostheses. The purpose of this study was to safely measure the stability of the implant and to determine whether the IST can be used even after the prosthesis cementation. Fifteen implants were placed on the artificial bone block.
Prostheses were classified into five groups: healing abutment, ready-made abutment, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), monolithic zirconia, and PFM. For PMMA, monolithic zirconia and PFM were produced using the same design within the computed-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system. Results of the analysis, showed that, in all groups, IST had significant reliability, and a difference was noted based on the type of prosthesis. There was no significant difference in IST between the ready-made abutment and the healing abutment, but the average IST decreased in PMMA, and the average IST increased in monolithic zirconia and PFM. Each group’s IST showed a consistent tendency according to the type of prosthesis. Thus, the IST can be used for the evaluation of implant stability, even after prosthesis cementation, as well as for the determination of the timing of implant loading. Because the change in IST was correlated with the hardness and elastic modulus of each type of prosthesis, additional research on the physical properties of each material is required.